What it does
Reads applications against the requirements written on the job, and produces a shortlist you can defend. Each candidate gets an assessment structured requirement by requirement: what the application shows, what it does not, and what a recruiter should ask to find out. The reasoning is the output; the ranking is a by-product. It is built around what screening gets wrong. It reads for evidence of the requirement rather than for the name of a former employer or a university, ignores the signals that correlate with background rather than capability, and never treats a career gap, a non-linear path, or an unfamiliar institution as a negative. Where an application is genuinely ambiguous, it says so and passes the question to a person instead of resolving it downward. Nothing is ever rejected automatically. The agent writes an assessment onto the application as a scorecard note; advancing or declining a candidate stays a human decision, always, and the assessment exists so that decision can be explained later. Personal data is handled accordingly: assessments cite the application, never carry identifiers beyond what the ATS already holds, and the agent has no ability to email, contact, or expose a candidate.
Example prompts
- Assess the active applications for job 4471 against the requirements on the posting.
- Which requirements can't actually be assessed from an application for this role?
- Read application 88210 and tell me what to ask this candidate in a screen.
Before you connect
The credentials this agent will ask you for — the full setup is on the Setup tab.
Needs 1 credential (1 required) to connect. See setup
