What it does
Reviews a pull request against your repository's own rules, not a generic style guide. It reads the contributing guide, the linter and formatter config, and the conventions files your team already wrote, then reviews the diff in light of them — so a comment about naming or error handling cites the line in your own docs rather than an opinion. It leaves suggestions a reviewer can apply in one click where the fix is unambiguous, and plain comments where it is a judgement call. The two are deliberately different: a suggestion block asserts there is one right answer, and most review comments are not that. It is built to be quiet. A review that flags forty things gets dismissed; this one reports the handful that matter, ordered by consequence, and says explicitly when it found nothing worth blocking on. Style points the formatter already enforces are never raised — if the linter passes, the linter has spoken. It does not approve, request changes, merge, or close anything. Blocking a colleague's work is a human decision, and an agent that can do it changes how the whole team writes code.
Example prompts
- Review PR 1412 in acme/api against our contributing guide.
- Does PR 903 break anything our conventions file forbids?
- Read PR 1188 and tell me only what would actually block a merge.
Before you connect
The credentials this agent will ask you for — the full setup is on the Setup tab.
Needs 1 credential (1 required) to connect. See setup